Papers
This section presents a collection of AHP/ANP papers. Whether you are a student, academic and/or professional in the field of decision making, you can help us expand this collection by sharing your papers on decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Analytic Network Process (ANP).
Search papers by author name:
Paper results for author: Mujgan Sagir Ozdemir
Ranking countries more reliably in the summer olympics
Thomas Saaty, Mujgan Sagir OzdemirJournal: International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessIn this paper we consider the many intangible criteria that influence the outcome of the Summer Olympics by using the Analytic Network Process, and apply the ideas to evaluate the medals won and the country scores in the 2012 London Olympics. Both the categories of games and the events in each ga...
Read MoreChoosing the best city of the future
Thomas Saaty, Mujgan Sagir OzdemirJournal: Journal of Urban ManagementThis paper describes various possibilities of the cities of futures considering various constraints and demand of society, environment and geography. The need for future cities arises because of the rapid growth in population and thereby causing a decline in the living standards. In the United St...
Read MoreThe rationality of punishment—measuring the severity of crimes: an AHP-based orders-of-magnitude approach
Thomas Saaty, Mujgan Sagir Ozdemir, Jennifer ShangWe propose an innovative AHP-based model to assess the severity of the harms a criminal commits to society in a comprehensive and coherent way. Different from the traditional approach of structuring alternatives into one level, we organize the alternatives into multiple levels of that hierarchy. ...
Read MoreHow many judges should there be in a group?
Thomas Saaty, Mujgan Sagir OzdemirJournal: Annals of Data ScienceThis paper briefly examines the question of how many judges are needed to obtain valid and consistent judgments when using the analytic hierarchy process. It turns out that if a judge is experienced and well versed in an area, he can be sufficient to provide the judgments instead of diluting his ...
Read MoreAn essay on rank preservation and reversal
Thomas Saaty, Mujgan Sagir OzdemirJournal: Mathematical and Computer ModellingRank preservation and reversal, so fundamental in decision making, have been an unresolved issue in the field of economics and utility theory and came into focus when the Analytic Hierarchy Process was developed because it uses paired comparisons that inevitably make the priorities of the alterna...
Read MoreExtending the measurement of tangibles to intangibles
Thomas Saaty, Mujgan Sagir OzdemirJournal: International Journal of Information Technology & Decision MakingTangibles have measurements generally on ratio scales with arbitrary units that are always interpreted by using judgments as to what particular purpose the measurements serve. How two measurements on a ratio scale are related with respect to dominance leads to forming their ratio which is a dimen...
Read MoreThe unknown in decision making: What to do about it
Mujgan Sagir Ozdemir, Thomas SaatyJournal: European journal of operational researchThe unknown or “other” that affects our lives is what we usually very much want to know about to cope with uncertainty. We often suspect that it affects us with partial and indefinite evidence that it exists but we only have uncertain feelings about it. Even when we do not know what it is we woul...
Read MoreWhy the magic number seven plus or minus two
Thomas Saaty, Mujgan Sagir OzdemirJournal: Mathematical and computer modellingIn 1956, Miller conjectured that there is an upper limit on our capacity to process information on simultaneously interacting elements with reliable accuracy and with validity. This limit is seven plus or minus two elements. He noted that the number 7 occurs in many aspects of life, from the seve...
Read MorePriority as dominance in derived measurement: Invariance of the principal eigenvector
Mujgan Sagir Ozdemir, Thomas SaatyRanking is a process of prioritization. Priorities, as measurement rather than pure guessing, can be derived from paired comparison judgments that generalize on ratios of actual measurements. Paired comparisons involve the selection of the smaller of the two objects being compared as the unit and...
Read MoreNegative priorities in the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Thomas Saaty, Mujgan Sagir OzdemirIn decision-making, there are often criteria that are opposite in direction to other criteria as in benefits (B) versus costs (C), and in opportunities (O) versus risks (R), and sometimes need to be distinguished by using negative numbers. In making paired comparisons of alternatives with respect...
Read More